(631)-271-3737,
QUEENS
(718)-751-0226
(516)-307-0262,
BROOKLYN
(347)-508-9316,
BOHEMIA
(631)-223-4502
(631)-271-3737,
QUEENS
(718)-751-0226
(516)-307-0262,
BROOKLYN
(347)-508-9316,
BOHEMIA
(631)-223-4502
Most debts can be aggressively settled by our law firm — because settlements are usually mutually beneficial, especially when creditors face the alternative of a bankruptcy or a litigation defense.


Despite the strong role of bankruptcy in providing debt relief, negotiated settlements play a large role too — and for many clients they are the better fit.
The Law Office of Ronald D. Weiss, P.C. is frequently retained to negotiate with banks, mortgage holders, credit card companies, car-financing companies, landlords, business creditors, tax creditors, and others. Because of the firm’s long experience with creditor negotiations, its specific expertise in debtor-creditor relations, and its real ability to threaten the alternatives of bankruptcy and/or litigation, our firm greatly improves a client’s ability to negotiate and settle.
There are many instances where clients have too much income to qualify for Chapter 7, too much equity in assets to make bankruptcy a good choice, or debt that is not overwhelming enough to require a filing. In those situations, negotiating for a lower payment the client can affordably pay is often the smarter solution.

Our firm advises what can be negotiated and how far a creditor may go — then communicates, persists, and documents every resolution in a written stipulation of settlement.
Upon a resolution, our firm enters into a written stipulation of settlement with the creditor and requires that supporting documents be prepared showing the matter has been settled. Most clients who come to us with credit card and other unsecured debt are initially interested in bankruptcy because it is thorough, certain, and uniform in eliminating, reducing, or reorganizing debt. But where the client has too much income for Chapter 7, too much equity in assets, debt that is high-risk for objection or non-dischargeable, or simply debt that is not overwhelming enough to justify a filing, a negotiated settlement is often the better tool.
Credit card debt is almost always present, along with unsecured personal loans — the debts most readily settled.
Owed to the IRS and to the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance.
Both government-backed and private student loans are open to negotiated resolutions.
For individuals seeking to reorganize their businesses — or to close them.
For those uninsured, whose coverage lapsed, or whose insurance did not fully cover treatment.
Fixing negative report items that are inaccurate, misleading, or taken out of context.
Where a client does not want to — or cannot — save a property, non-retention options seek a measured benefit for the debtor while limiting liability. These include third-party short sales, deed-in-lieu agreements, cash-for-keys agreements, and consent-to-judgment agreements. (Their opposite, retention options such as modifications, friendly short sales, reinstatement, and forbearance, are addressed under Mortgage Modifications.)
Our coordinated and elegant approach to debt negotiation makes settlement a viable option and an important debt-relief tool.

No more collection calls or sleepless nights — just a clear path forward, with an experienced attorney at your side.
Free ConsultationBecause clients often come to us with numerous debts, we prepare a separate file for each creditor — then systematically write and call every one in pursuit of settlement, leveraging our bankruptcy and litigation background at every contact.
Each creditor file lists the pertinent payment history, negotiation history, and contact and loan information, so we can track progress and keep you advised. Creditor negotiations can be involved — and our experience, together with the leverage of your other legal options, is what makes the difference. Our debt negotiators have legal background and individually seek the best possible resolution for each separate debt. The firm regularly represents its Long Island and New York clients in credit card negotiations.
Our efforts start by gathering as much information and documentation as possible at an intake appointment. Your point of view on the history of the debt, the hardship in payments, and the payment and negotiation history all matter to us — along with statements, invoices, letters, collection notices, and litigation documents. We also assess the household’s overall income, expenses, budget, and debt situation to determine what settlements you can afford and how they can be structured: a lump sum, installments, or a combination of the two.
We gather further information from legal, asset, and debt searches. We start with a credit report showing your debt and payment history. Where there is real property, we may run a lien search at different levels to assess judgment, tax, and mortgage liens. Other searches include a judgment search, a litigation search, and a bankruptcy search to assess past or current activity in the court system.
Often several parties contact you about one debt — the original creditor, a debt buyer, a servicer, a collections company, and/or an attorney. We determine who actually holds the authority to negotiate, since the original creditor may no longer own the debt and the attorney may not have settlement authority. We then write the proper party a letter explaining your hardship and why a negotiated resolution — even at a reduction — is the creditor’s best-case outcome given your financial situation and your legal alternatives of bankruptcy and litigation.
Once started, settlement may entail several rounds of offers and counteroffers. We offer an amount and payment term that is the lowest we can reasonably propose in a serious negotiation; the creditor counters, and after several rounds we arrive at the best available settlement. Where a creditor shows no interest in a reasonable settlement, we may pause and concentrate on creditors ready to engage — and come back later, since a creditor’s position often improves with time.
At the end we document the resolution with letters and a formal, stipulated settlement agreement signed by both parties. As long as you abide by the agreement, you are protected. It specifies how the creditor must notice you and our office if you default, and how many notices must be given. If you honor the agreement to the end of its term, the debt is permanently resolved.
A satisfaction-of-debt agreement is obtained, and where there is a judgment it is filed — or, in the case of real estate with liens, a release-of-liens document is executed and filed to clear title.
Our law office has a unique advantage in negotiating debt: our other services — bankruptcy and litigation defense — are credible threats that leverage better deals, and real alternatives where a fair settlement is not forthcoming.
Bankruptcy as a threat and alternative. The threat of a Chapter 7 case makes a negotiated solution look advantageous to a creditor, because Chapter 7 eliminates most or all of a client’s debt — usually without any payment — in an average case of roughly 3½ months. Even where a client does not qualify for Chapter 7, a Chapter 13 plan can spread debt over 60 months with no interest on most debts and, in a percentage plan, at a reduced amount. Because our firm regularly files bankruptcy cases, the threat is credible — and if it does not produce a settlement, bankruptcy can be pursued for real.
Litigation defense as a threat and alternative. Creditors collecting credit card debt rarely expect a defense, since most debtors acquiesce. The threat of high litigation fees and delay creates a disincentive to collect and makes a settlement look like the better-value option. If a client must actually litigate, we answer the summons and complaint — within 20–30 days of service — asserting defenses and counterclaims on issues such as defective service, missing loan documents, unclear terms, and improper interest or fees, and engaging in discovery. Because our firm regularly defends collection litigation, this threat is credible too.
These options are not just threats — they become real alternatives where the desired settlement is not forthcoming.
Trusted debt-relief representation across Long Island, Queens & Brooklyn.
Schedule a Free Consultation
When the pressure lifts, everything feels lighter. We help New York families get there — and stay there.
Bankruptcy is powerful, but it is not always the right tool. In several situations a negotiated settlement is the better fit — here are the most common.
Chapter 7 can be filed only if income — averaged over the last six months and measured by household size — is below the New York State median. Certain protected spending items (insurance, mortgage arrears, daycare, support for an elderly or ill relative, secured-debt installments) can reduce counted income, but squeezing a client into Chapter 7 may not be advisable when income is more than $10,000–$15,000 above the median. Where neither Chapter 7 nor Chapter 13 is possible or desirable due to excess income, negotiation becomes a real solution to review.
Unprotected equity could be marshaled by a Chapter 7 trustee and sold to pay creditors. Secured liens and exemptions protect much of it — New York’s homestead exemption protects $204,825 per owner-occupant, and the federal scheme offers a “wildcard” of roughly $17,475 per debtor. Most clients keep everything they own if they stay current and do not hold too much unprotected equity. But where that equity would make a Chapter 7 too risky and a Chapter 13 too expensive, negotiation is a favored option.
Closely related to equity is the issue of avoidable transfers — “preferences” (payments to creditors within 90 days of filing, or one year for insiders) and “fraudulent transfers” (transfers for less than reasonable value within six years, usually to relatives). These are not always obvious; what looks innocent can be alleged as avoidable. Like unprotected equity, they can make a Chapter 7 too risky and a Chapter 13 too expensive, favoring negotiation.
Sometimes a client could file Chapter 7, or a low-percentage Chapter 13, but chooses not to because the debt is relatively small, the creditors few, or they are concerned about their credit report. A report entry showing “Settled Outside of Terms” may be preferable to a Chapter 7 discharge — but only if the client can comfortably and timely meet the settlement. Before embarking on settlement, it is important to confirm the financial resources to adhere to it.
Certain debts — student loans and some taxes — are inherently non-dischargeable and must be negotiated. Other debts may draw an objection where there was bad-faith spending, misrepresentation, or a large amount of recent cash advances or balance transfers before filing. Such an objection takes the form of an adversary proceeding — contested litigation inside the bankruptcy. Where the client has the resources to settle, that route may be preferable to risking an objection to discharge.
The reverse is equally true. Where a client lacks the ability or the resources to negotiate, bankruptcy is the better path — and we will tell you so.
Lack of ability to settle. A settlement requires an offer — a lump sum or installments. If the client’s ability to pay is weak or non-existent, bankruptcy is preferable. A preference for speed. Even where a client could negotiate, Chapter 7 is often more attractive because the discharge arrives within a few months and, in most “no-asset” cases, the client pays nothing to the trustee or creditors — faster, cheaper, and more efficient than payments over time to multiple creditors.
Undesired taxes. Outside of bankruptcy, debt forgiveness is generally treated as taxable “income,” so settling a very large debt can trigger a large tax — an issue that does not exist in bankruptcy (subject to exceptions such as insolvency, gift, or forgiven deductible interest). Fragmented, hard-to-reach debt. Where debts are scattered, difficult to contact, or difficult to settle, a Chapter 7 simply eliminates them — including debts you did not realize were there.

With most credit card situations, litigation is a risky strategy used mainly to gain time and leverage. Negotiation is usually the better main option — and here is when.
Negotiation is preferable where, as with credit cards, the debts are not huge and are not subject to many disputed issues. If the debts are more unique, much larger, and much more disputed, litigation may be preferable — at least at the outset. But litigation is not an easy solution and should be reserved for a concentrated, disputed, high-amount debt where its advantages are apparent.
Litigation works where there is a concentrated, disputed debt that is high in amount — otherwise, negotiation prevails.
Your debt settled, your budget restored — and your footing back under you.
Schedule a Free ConsultationWhere bankruptcy is not possible or not desired, we negotiate lump-sum settlements and payment plans with your creditors — often reducing a debt to 33–50% in a lump sum, and reducing interest and monthly payments in an installment plan.
Our approach. In every negotiation we tell the creditor why our offer is to their advantage. Given our concentrations in bankruptcy and litigation defense, it is realistic for us to warn creditors of those more drastic options — while making clear we would rather avoid them if a fair settlement is reached. We also advocate any hardships you have faced: reduced income, health issues, marital problems, business failures, job loss, or large necessary expenditures, alongside your limited income and lack of equity. The goal is to sell the creditor on the settlement as their best chance to recover part of the debt.
The technique. We can structure several offers, with the variables being the amount down, the number of installments, the time to pay, the amount due at the end, and any interest or fees. Our agreements typically carry no interest or late fees going forward, a reduced principal, and no large balloon at the end — the main terms bargained are how much of the partial principal is paid, and over how long.
Once terms are set, we draft or review a settlement agreement laying out precise terms — including noticing provisions, default warnings, and what happens if compliance becomes difficult — signed by all parties before a notary. Where there is a judgment, a satisfaction of judgment is prepared and filed once the settlement is fully paid. Where the creditor holds a lien (judgment, voluntary secured, or mechanic’s), a lien release is prepared and filed to clear your property.

Every situation is different. We find the path that protects what matters most to you.
Most of the marketing aimed at people seeking debt relief comes from Debt Consolidation and Debt Reduction companies — which work very differently from our law office.
Debt Consolidation is heavily advertised but limited: it reduces the interest you pay without reducing principal, bundling your cards into one monthly payment plus a fee across a plan of at least five years. The reduction is rarely enough for a client in real hardship, and cards often fall off the plan through delays or misallocated payments — leaving a partial solution at best. Debt Reduction has even more severe problems: these firms have you pay them for months to build a lump sum before approaching a single creditor, then repeat — so they typically settle only one or two debts before your other, unpaid creditors move to collections and court.
Our method combines the best of both without their problems. Unlike consolidation, we eliminate rather than reduce interest and seek a significant cut in principal. Unlike reduction, we approach all creditors at once rather than one at a time, so no neglected creditor drags you into court. Where a lump sum is not possible, we seek a hybrid or installment agreement. Our relatively small Negotiations Department — staffed by law-school graduates and attendees, not a large clerical operation — strategizes, optimizes, and customizes each negotiation to obtain the best outcome for that individual debt, client, and settlement.
Room to breathe again — your debt reduced, your finances back under control.
Talk to an AttorneyThe experience of the attorney representing you is a critical factor in your success in obtaining relief from credit card and other unsecured debt — and it is the experience our office brings to every negotiation.
Since 1993 we have successfully represented thousands of clients across Long Island, Nassau County, and Suffolk County in finding relief from unsecured debt — helping many permanently eliminate that debt and re-establish their financial stability. When an individual owes unsecured debt, all of their legal options must be carefully pursued together: negotiated settlements, bankruptcy, and litigation defense. Because we practice in all three, our threats are credible and our settlements are stronger.
Let us help you with experience and expertise that is both affordable and personable — from our office in Melville, Long Island. We will discuss and advise you about negotiation and whether it fits your particular circumstances.

Our consultations are free — the advice may be invaluable.
How our attorneys help you save your home and resolve mortgage debt.
Our attorneys have represented Long Island and New York City clients since 1988. Schedule your free, confidential consultation today.
