


A motion for summary judgment is usually made by the plaintiff after 1) the pleadings (the plaintiff’s summons and complaint and the defendant’s answer and/or motion to dismiss) and, after 2) foreclosure settlement conferences are concluded without a resolution or settlement. At this point the litigation must go forward in order for it not to get delayed.

If the high bidder successfully closes within 30 days on the foreclosure sale, with the referee giving the high bidder the referee deed in return for the balance of the high bid amount, the referee after the closing files a report of sale which shows whether or not there was a surplus of funds from the sale. However if the high bidder fails to close, the referee notifies the Court and the plaintiff’s attorneys and a new foreclosure sale needs to be scheduled, with the plaintiff usually retaining the down payment amount.



However, a defendant does not have to prevail in having the court order an evidentiary hearing in order to successfully oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant just has to show that the plaintiff can not meet its burden for the motion for summary judgment in terms of credible affidavits, documentary evidence and other consistent proof showing that the plaintiff is entitled to be granted summary judgment. For example the affidavits submitted by the plaintiffs in support of summary judgment are often vulnerable to attack since often vague and attest to specific knowledge that is not based on direct personal knowledge but based on business records that the plaintiffs often fail to produce. Also where the loan changes hands among several lenders, and where the mortgage and note were assigned and endorsed to several parties and were handled by more than one servicer, the affidavit of one entity which alleges to know what happened when the loan was handled by another entity based on business records which were allegedly transferred and integrated, but are not currently produced is often problematic and can be questioned, probed and challenged as not meeting the evidentiary rules for the business records exception to the hearsay rule.
A cross-motion to compel discovery, pursuant to CPLR 3124, can be made by the defendant if the plaintiff has failed to respond to any discovery requests made by the defendant including interrogatories, demands for production of documents, notices to admit or to produce, and/or depositions. Prior to making a motion or cross-motion to compel discovery the parties are expected to negotiate in good faith over any discovery that may be objectionable by the defendant (i.e., as overly broad, irrelevant, unavailable and/or privileged etc.) and attempt to arrive at a good faith compromise. It is one parties complete ignoring of the discovery requests that could cause a court to compel discovery and/or sanction the non-complying party by striking their answer as to issues related to the issues raised by the discovery.
A cross-motion to dismiss the foreclosure, pursuant to CPLR 3211, can be made based on the any of the following grounds: a) a defense derived from documentary evidence; b) the court’s not having jurisdiction over the defendants and/or causes of action; c) the plaintiff and/or the defendant lacking legal capacity to sue of be sued; d) the debt can not be pursued due to statute of limitations, a bankruptcy discharge, and/or past settlement.

However, if the plaintiff prevails on summary judgment, we review carefully the decision of the court and assess options with our client. Options would include asking the court to reconsider the decision in favor of summary judgment with either a motion to reargue(within 30 days to the notice of entry of the order), a motion to renew, a motion to vacate the decision, a motion for a stay pending appeal and/or a notice of appeal (within 30 days to the notice of entry of the order). Even if the defendant is seeking to contest the decision, it would need to obtain a stay from the NYS Supreme Court, Appellate Division and/or U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the case not to continue to go forward.
If the foreclosure case goes forward without a stay, the plaintiff would now seek to have the appointed referee calculate the amount owed to the plaintiff in a referee oath and report, which would then become part of the papers sought for court approval in the second major motion of the the foreclosure case, the motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale.

Let us show you how our experience, skill, and energy can change the dynamics of the foreclosure case by allowing our legal team’s talent to concentrate on defending you. Call us at 631-271-3737 for a free legal consultation regarding the motion for summary judgment and any other issues related to the foreclosure matter.
Contact Us
Contact Us