Keep the Nassau Home,
Stop the Sale

In a “traditional” or “catch-up” plan, the client goes back to making post-petition mortgage payments and, in addition, makes monthly Chapter 13 plan payments on pre-petition arrears and debt to a court-appointed trustee. The combination keeps the client from falling further behind while catching up on the arrears that existed before filing. Secured debt such as mortgage arrears, and priority debt such as taxes, must be paid in full over the plan, while unsecured credit card debt can be paid at a percentage on the dollar.

Because many foreclosures involve mortgage arrears of many years that are too high to cure over a 60-month plan, seeking a mortgage loan modification through Loss Mitigation programs adopted by most Bankruptcy Courts has become a standard approach. Loss Mitigation is the pursuit of a mortgage modification by the debtor, overseen and encouraged by the Bankruptcy Court, which can pressure both the debtor’s and lender’s attorneys to coordinate over documents and information to determine whether the debtor qualifies for a modification. During the process, the debtor pays the hypothetical modified payment under the plan to the trustee to demonstrate an ability to sustain the modification.

The differences are stark: the traditional plan is more expensive but generally safer, since its success depends on payments rather than on approval of a modification. The loss-mitigation plan is less expensive month-to-month, but it is not “guaranteed” because it depends on the lender approving the debtor’s modification application. For a Nassau homeowner, a successful modification can mean a lower rate, a re-amortized balance, or the arrears rolled back into the loan, so the long-term payment becomes something you can actually carry once the plan ends. Pairing loss mitigation with a Chapter 13 plan is a lever most competitor pages never mention because most firms never run it; we do, and we know the program’s deadlines and paperwork well enough to keep it on schedule.

Chapter 13 bankruptcy is the reorganization route that most Nassau homeowners behind on the mortgage actually need: it forces the lender to accept a court-supervised catch-up plan, protects a co-signer, and can strip an underwater junior lien, none of which a Chapter 7 can do. If your income is above the New York median or you have real equity to protect, Chapter 13 is often not just the better tool but the only one that keeps the roof over your head. Where a client can qualify for both and needs both, a Chapter 7 can be filed first to discharge unsecured debt, followed by a Chapter 13 to deal with mortgage arrears, a sequence nicknamed a “Chapter 20” that requires careful pivoting of the budget.

Versus a mortgage modification negotiation: a modification seeks to lower the monthly payment and restructure the loan on advantageous terms, which, if obtained, exceed what a “traditional” Chapter 13 achieves, but modifications are at the discretion of the mortgage holder and are not always obtainable. By contrast, the traditional Chapter 13 plan is imposed on the lender, who must accept regular post-petition payments as long as the debtor stays current. A “loss mitigation” Chapter 13 plan is similar to a modification negotiation, but pursues the modification inside the case, adding the protection of the automatic stay, loss-mitigation hearings, and court oversight. In simpler situations where the foreclosure is not advanced and direct negotiation is feasible, a modification without the structure of a Chapter 13 case can be preferable.